What is a Global Culture?
A
number of people interviewed in this study believe that there
is a 'global' or 'dominant culture' that is based on consumerism,
cultural superficiality and bad food and coffee.** And it is often
seen as the culture of the great postwar middle suburbs; the dependable
'other' that imbues Fitzroy with its unique but somewhat inverse
identity. Most notably there is a strong community resistance
to the multinational retail chains that pierce the global-urban
landscape.
Accordingly,
many of the people interviewed here believe that local cultural
production is based on effort, personal sacrifice and the wish
to champion local idiosyncrasies whilst dominant cultural forms
are inimical to this (as large homogeneous markets and tastes
produce larger profits for the few).
The
users of milkbar.com.au can view what some of the people in Fitzroy
have to say about the changing culture in their area. There are
a number of conflicting opinions but the users may recognise some
of the reoccurring themes. It is the quirky, the ordinary and
the idiosyncratic that are often overlooked in what some people
call the study of the global.

**
One definition of 'dominant culture' emanates from the fact that
in the past couple of decades there has been a demise in the national
regulatory frameworks of mass-communication (television, radio,
and newspapers). Mass-communication has become highly corporatised
and thus rewards its own globally syndicated economic ideologies.
Thomas Frank in this provocatively titled book One Market Under
God: Extreme Capitalism, Market Populism and the End of Economic
Democracy describes this movement as 'market fundamentalism'.(3)
He places 'dominant culture' (or populism) in an historical
context and asserts that populism was once a movement 'by the
people for the people' but now it is driven by media elites who
simply want us to consume more.
In
an economic populist sphere any culture that exists outside of
the market (such as governments, universities, artists, local
cultural communities, and even Historians!) could be labeled 'elitist'
and out of touch with 'the people'. 'The people' are consumers
and the independent agency of the consumers is sometimes even
mistaken as democracy. Economic globalisation with it popular
cultural forms is the overriding type of globalisation. This is
what Richard Falk terms 'globalisation from above' and is this
variety of globalisation that spurred the protest movement against
the World Trade Organisation in Seattle in 1999 and the protest
against the World Economic
Forum in Melbourne on September 11, 2000.
(3)
Frank, Thomas. One Market Under God: Extreme Capitalism, Market
Populism and the End of Economic Democracy, Double Day, New York,
2000.
|