From:
"BLACKBURN Kevin Peter (HSSE)" <kpblack@nie.edu.sg>
List Editor: Dr P J Martyr <P.Martyr@utas.edu.au>
Editor's Subject: Reply: Query: Historical Perspectives on Globalisation
Author's Subject: Reply: Query: Historical Perspectives on Globalisation
Date Written: Thu, 31 Aug 2000 13:27:09 +1000
Date Posted: Thu, 31 Aug 2000 13:27:09 +1000
Looking at the past using contemporary perspectives drawn from the process called
globalisation today
does provide insights to the past, but it also tends to gloss over differences,
which make me hesistant
about the value of any reinterpetation of such a multifaceted process that historians
know as
imperialism as simply globalisation. A colleague (who works on Southeast Asia,
not Australia) drew a parallel between the IMF's intervention in the Indonesian
economy to "open it up" and the intervention of the British in the
age of the "new imperialism" of the nineteenth century when the Egyptian
government, in eyes of the British, could not manage its finances, and this
provoked a political crisis that led to intevention and take over. I am not
as enthusaistic about drawing such parallels. However, in Australia, there are
also parallels that can be drawn. But I don't think seeing what is occuring
as globalisation helps much. An example might be the pastoralist expansion of
the 1820s and 1830s in Southeast Australia and in Tasmania. Large parcels of
land were forcibly taken off Aboriginal people and turned into sheep runs to
produce wool for the expanding textile industry in Britain. One could argue
that this was simply part of bringing the land into the global economy. However,
this is really reproducing the perspective of the pastoralists. Still, white
historians happily did this until recent times. Frontier wars were fought between
indigenous people and the invaders over these lands, such as the Black War in
Tasmania, which occurred when the Europeans started to move out of the small
areas that they had occupied for decades to establish large sheep runs to take
financial advantage of the booming wool market. Adopting any perspective that
this whole process of imperialism was globalisation brings with it the danger
of reducing the efforts of indigenous people to keep their land (and their autonomy)
as merely an attempt to resist globalisation.
Kevin Blackburn
Nanyang Technological University
Singapore